The simple act of chewing gum has been a human practice for thousands of years, with ancient civilizations from the Greeks to the Mayans utilizing natural tree resins and saps for oral hygiene, breath freshening, and even medicinal purposes. However, the chewing gum industry has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past century, shifting from natural, plant-based ingredients to synthetic, petroleum-derived compounds that prioritize shelf life, consistency, and profit margins over health benefits. This fundamental change has created a stark divide between natural chewing gum and regular commercial gum that extends far beyond simple ingredient preferences to encompass significant differences in health impact, environmental sustainability, and therapeutic potential.
Today’s commercial gum market is dominated by products containing synthetic gum bases, artificial sweeteners, preservatives, and chemical additives that bear little resemblance to the natural chewing substances our ancestors used. While these modern formulations may offer consistent texture and long-lasting flavor, they come with hidden costs to both human health and environmental well-being that are only beginning to be fully understood [1]. In contrast, the resurgence of natural chewing gum represents a return to traditional wisdom enhanced by modern scientific understanding, offering consumers a healthier alternative that provides genuine oral health benefits while avoiding the potential risks associated with synthetic ingredients.
This comprehensive analysis examines the fundamental differences between natural and regular chewing gum across multiple dimensions: ingredient composition, manufacturing processes, health implications, environmental impact, and therapeutic potential. As consumers become increasingly conscious about the products they use daily, understanding these differences becomes crucial for making informed decisions that align with personal health goals and values. The evidence reveals that the choice between natural and regular gum is not merely a matter of preference but a decision that can significantly impact oral health, overall wellness, and environmental sustainability.
The Evolution of Chewing Gum: From Natural to Synthetic
The history of chewing gum provides essential context for understanding why the modern industry shifted away from natural ingredients and what we may have lost in the process. Archaeological evidence suggests that humans have been chewing natural gums and resins for at least 9,000 years, with the earliest known examples found in Scandinavia where ancient peoples chewed birch bark tar [2]. These early chewing substances served multiple purposes: cleaning teeth, freshening breath, satisfying hunger, and providing medicinal benefits through the bioactive compounds naturally present in tree resins.
The ancient Greeks chewed mastic gum from the Pistacia lentiscus tree, recognizing its antibacterial properties and digestive benefits. Similarly, the Maya and Aztec civilizations harvested chicle from the sapodilla tree, creating a sustainable chewing gum industry that lasted for centuries without depleting natural resources [3]. These traditional practices demonstrate that natural chewing gum was not merely a recreational activity but an integral part of oral hygiene and health maintenance in pre-industrial societies.
The transformation of the chewing gum industry began in the mid-19th century when entrepreneurs like Thomas Adams and William Wrigley started commercializing chicle-based gums in the United States. Initially, these commercial products maintained their natural foundation, using chicle as the primary gum base while adding natural flavors and sweeteners. However, the demands of mass production, extended shelf life, and consistent quality gradually drove manufacturers toward synthetic alternatives that could be more easily controlled and standardized [4].
The pivotal shift occurred during World War II when chicle supplies became unreliable due to wartime disruptions. Manufacturers began experimenting with synthetic rubber compounds and petroleum-based polymers as gum base alternatives. What started as a wartime necessity became the industry standard as companies discovered that synthetic bases offered significant cost advantages and manufacturing efficiencies compared to natural chicle [5]. This transition marked the beginning of the modern era of synthetic chewing gum, fundamentally altering the composition and properties of this ancient human practice.
The post-war period saw the complete industrialization of gum production, with synthetic gum bases becoming increasingly complex mixtures of polymers, plasticizers, emulsifiers, and stabilizers. The Food and Drug Administration’s classification of gum base as a single ingredient, regardless of its actual composition, allowed manufacturers to use proprietary blends of synthetic compounds without detailed disclosure to consumers [6]. This regulatory framework enabled the widespread adoption of synthetic ingredients while keeping consumers largely unaware of the dramatic changes in gum composition.
Ingredient Analysis: Natural vs Synthetic Components
The most fundamental difference between natural and regular chewing gum lies in their ingredient composition, with implications that extend far beyond simple labeling preferences. Understanding these compositional differences is crucial for evaluating the health, environmental, and therapeutic implications of each approach to gum manufacturing.
Natural Chewing Gum Base Components represent a return to the traditional foundation of chewing gum, utilizing sustainably harvested tree resins and saps that have been used safely for millennia. Chicle, derived from the sapodilla tree (Manilkara zapota), remains the gold standard for natural gum bases due to its ideal chewing properties and biodegradability [7]. The harvesting process involves making diagonal cuts in the tree bark and collecting the latex that flows out, a method that doesn’t harm the tree and allows for sustainable long-term production.
Mastic gum, obtained from the Pistacia lentiscus tree native to the Mediterranean region, offers additional therapeutic benefits beyond its function as a gum base. Research has documented mastic’s antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and digestive properties, making it a valuable functional ingredient rather than merely a chewing medium [8]. The traditional harvesting of mastic involves collecting crystallized resin tears that naturally exude from the tree, a process that has remained unchanged for thousands of years and supports local economies in regions like the Greek island of Chios.
Spruce gum, traditionally used by Native American populations, provides another natural gum base option with documented antimicrobial properties. The resin from spruce trees contains compounds like terpenes and phenolic acids that contribute to oral health while providing a pleasant, piney flavor profile [9]. Modern extraction methods have refined the purification process while maintaining the beneficial compounds that make spruce gum therapeutically valuable.
Synthetic Gum Base Ingredients in regular commercial gum represent a complex mixture of petroleum-derived polymers and chemical additives designed to replicate the chewing properties of natural resins while offering manufacturing advantages. The primary components typically include polyvinyl acetate, a plastic polymer that provides the basic chewing texture, along with various plasticizers like polyisobutylene that modify flexibility and elasticity [10].
The synthetic gum base formulation also includes emulsifiers such as lecithin or glycerol esters, which help blend oil and water-based components, and antioxidants like BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) or BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) that prevent rancidity and extend shelf life. These chemical additives, while generally recognized as safe by regulatory agencies, represent a significant departure from the simple, natural composition of traditional chewing gums [11].
Wax components in synthetic gum bases often include paraffin wax, a petroleum derivative, or microcrystalline wax, which help control texture and release characteristics. These synthetic waxes lack the beneficial properties of natural waxes like beeswax or carnauba wax, which contain vitamins, minerals, and protective compounds that can contribute to oral health [12].
Sweetener Differences between natural and regular gum represent another crucial distinction with significant health implications. Regular commercial gums typically rely on artificial sweeteners like aspartame, sucralose, or acesulfame potassium, which provide intense sweetness without calories but come with ongoing safety debates and potential health concerns [13]. These synthetic sweeteners can affect gut microbiome balance and may trigger adverse reactions in sensitive individuals.
Natural chewing gums utilize sweeteners like xylitol and erythritol, which are derived from natural sources and offer genuine oral health benefits beyond simple sweetening. Xylitol, originally extracted from birch bark, has been extensively studied for its ability to reduce harmful oral bacteria and promote remineralization [14]. Erythritol, naturally found in fruits and fermented foods, provides similar antibacterial benefits while being well-tolerated by individuals with digestive sensitivities.
Flavoring Agent Comparisons reveal another significant difference between natural and synthetic gum formulations. Regular gums typically use artificial flavoring compounds that are chemically synthesized to mimic natural flavors but lack the complexity and potential health benefits of their natural counterparts. These artificial flavors may contain dozens of chemical compounds designed to create specific taste profiles while maintaining consistency across production batches [15].
Natural gums utilize essential oils, plant extracts, and naturally derived flavoring compounds that provide not only taste but also therapeutic benefits. Peppermint essential oil, for example, contains menthol and other compounds with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties that contribute to oral health beyond simple flavor enhancement [16]. Similarly, cinnamon extract provides natural antimicrobial activity while delivering a warm, pleasant taste that doesn’t require synthetic enhancement.
Health Implications: Beyond Simple Natural Chewing Gum
The health implications of choosing natural versus regular chewing gum extend far beyond the immediate act of chewing, encompassing effects on oral health, digestive function, systemic wellness, and long-term exposure to synthetic chemicals. Understanding these health differences is crucial for consumers seeking to optimize their wellness through informed product choices.
Oral Health Benefits represent one of the most significant advantages of natural chewing gum over synthetic alternatives. Natural gum bases like chicle and mastic provide mechanical cleaning action while delivering therapeutic compounds directly to oral tissues. The act of chewing natural gum stimulates saliva production, which helps neutralize acids, wash away food particles, and provide natural antimicrobial protection [17].
Research has demonstrated that mastic gum possesses potent antibacterial properties against oral pathogens, including Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis, which are primary contributors to tooth decay and gum disease [18]. Unlike synthetic gums that provide only mechanical benefits, natural gums actively contribute to oral health through their bioactive compounds. The sustained release of these therapeutic agents during chewing provides prolonged antimicrobial activity that continues even after the gum is discarded.
Natural sweeteners like xylitol and erythritol used in natural gums provide additional oral health benefits that synthetic sweeteners cannot match. Clinical studies have consistently shown that xylitol can reduce cavity-causing bacteria by up to 75% while promoting remineralization of early tooth decay [19]. This therapeutic effect transforms chewing gum from a simple recreational activity into an active oral health intervention.
Digestive System Impact represents another crucial difference between natural and synthetic gums. Natural gum bases are biodegradable and, if accidentally swallowed, can be broken down by digestive enzymes without causing harm. The natural polymers in chicle and other plant-based gum bases are similar to dietary fibers and can be processed by the human digestive system [20].
In contrast, synthetic gum bases contain non-biodegradable polymers that cannot be digested if swallowed. While small amounts typically pass through the digestive system without causing immediate harm, regular ingestion of synthetic gum components may contribute to digestive issues and could potentially accumulate in the body over time [21]. This difference is particularly important for children, who are more likely to accidentally swallow gum and may be more susceptible to the effects of synthetic chemical exposure.
The artificial sweeteners commonly used in regular gums have been associated with digestive disturbances, including bloating, gas, and diarrhea, particularly when consumed in large quantities. Some individuals experience these effects even with moderate consumption, making natural sweeteners a preferable option for those with sensitive digestive systems [22].
Chemical Exposure Concerns associated with regular chewing gum consumption have become increasingly relevant as research reveals the potential health impacts of chronic low-level exposure to synthetic chemicals. The complex mixture of polymers, plasticizers, and additives in synthetic gum bases represents a daily source of chemical exposure that accumulates over time with regular use [23].
Phthalates, commonly used as plasticizers in synthetic gum bases, have been identified as endocrine disruptors that may interfere with hormone function and reproductive health. While the levels in individual pieces of gum may be low, the cumulative effect of daily exposure over years or decades raises legitimate health concerns, particularly for children and pregnant women [24].
The preservatives and antioxidants used in synthetic gums, such as BHT and BHA, have been associated with potential carcinogenic effects in animal studies, leading some countries to restrict their use in food products. While regulatory agencies maintain that these compounds are safe at approved levels, the precautionary principle suggests that avoiding unnecessary exposure to potentially harmful chemicals is prudent [25].
Allergenic Potential differs significantly between natural and synthetic gums, with implications for individuals with chemical sensitivities or allergies. Natural gums typically contain fewer potential allergens and use ingredients that have been safely consumed by humans for thousands of years. The simple ingredient profiles of natural gums make it easier for sensitive individuals to identify and avoid problematic components [26].
Synthetic gums, with their complex mixtures of chemical compounds, present a higher risk of triggering allergic reactions or chemical sensitivities. The proprietary nature of many synthetic gum base formulations makes it difficult for consumers to identify specific allergens, complicating the management of food allergies and chemical sensitivities [27].
Natural Chewing Gum: Environmental Impact and Sustainability
The environmental implications of natural versus regular chewing gum extend from raw material sourcing through manufacturing, use, and disposal, creating a comprehensive sustainability profile that increasingly influences consumer choices and corporate responsibility initiatives. Understanding these environmental differences is crucial for consumers seeking to minimize their ecological footprint while maintaining oral health practices.
Raw Material Sourcing represents the foundation of environmental impact differences between natural and synthetic gums. Natural gum production relies on renewable biological resources that can be sustainably harvested without depleting the source. Chicle harvesting, for example, involves tapping sapodilla trees in a manner similar to maple syrup collection, allowing trees to continue growing and producing resin for decades [28]. This sustainable harvesting model supports forest conservation by providing economic incentives for maintaining natural ecosystems rather than converting them to agriculture or development.
The chicle industry in Central America and Mexico has historically supported indigenous communities and small-scale farmers who practice traditional forest management techniques. These sustainable harvesting practices maintain biodiversity, protect wildlife habitats, and provide carbon sequestration benefits that contribute to climate change mitigation [29]. The economic value of chicle harvesting creates powerful incentives for forest conservation, demonstrating how natural gum production can align economic and environmental interests.
Mastic gum production on the Greek island of Chios represents another model of sustainable natural resource management. The traditional cultivation and harvesting of mastic trees has been practiced for over 2,500 years, creating a stable ecosystem that supports both human communities and natural biodiversity. The UNESCO recognition of mastic cultivation as an Intangible Cultural Heritage highlights the cultural and environmental significance of these traditional practices [30].
In contrast, synthetic gum base production relies heavily on petroleum-derived chemicals that contribute to fossil fuel consumption and associated environmental impacts. The extraction, refining, and chemical processing required to produce synthetic polymers generate significant greenhouse gas emissions and environmental pollution. The non-renewable nature of petroleum resources means that synthetic gum production is inherently unsustainable in the long term [31].
Manufacturing Environmental Impact differs dramatically between natural and synthetic gum production processes. Natural gum manufacturing typically involves minimal processing, with chicle and other natural resins requiring only cleaning, purification, and blending with natural sweeteners and flavors. This simple processing requires less energy and generates fewer emissions compared to the complex chemical synthesis required for synthetic gum bases [32].
The production of synthetic polymers for gum bases involves high-temperature chemical reactions, extensive purification processes, and the use of toxic solvents and catalysts. These manufacturing processes consume significant amounts of energy and water while generating chemical waste that requires careful disposal or treatment. The environmental footprint of synthetic polymer production extends beyond the immediate manufacturing facility to include the entire supply chain of chemical precursors [33].
Water usage represents another significant environmental consideration, with synthetic gum production typically requiring more water for cooling, cleaning, and waste treatment compared to natural gum processing. The quality of wastewater from synthetic production facilities also tends to be more problematic, requiring advanced treatment systems to remove chemical contaminants before discharge [34].
Disposal and Biodegradability present perhaps the most visible environmental difference between natural and synthetic gums. Natural gum bases are completely biodegradable, breaking down naturally when discarded in the environment. Chicle-based gums typically decompose within weeks to months when exposed to natural conditions, leaving no permanent environmental residue [35].
The biodegradability of natural gums eliminates the persistent litter problem associated with synthetic gum disposal. When natural gum is discarded, it becomes food for microorganisms and eventually returns to the soil as organic matter, completing a natural cycle that doesn’t burden the environment with permanent waste [36].
Synthetic gums, composed of non-biodegradable polymers, persist in the environment for years or even decades after disposal. The ubiquitous presence of discarded synthetic gum on sidewalks, under desks, and in public spaces represents a significant litter problem that requires expensive cleanup efforts and contributes to urban environmental degradation [37]. The non-biodegradable nature of synthetic gum means that every piece ever manufactured still exists somewhere in the environment, contributing to the growing problem of plastic pollution.
Carbon Footprint Analysis reveals significant differences in the climate impact of natural versus synthetic gum production. Natural gum production typically has a lower carbon footprint due to the renewable nature of raw materials and simpler processing requirements. The trees that produce natural gum bases also provide carbon sequestration benefits, effectively removing CO2 from the atmosphere during their growth [38].
Life cycle assessments of chicle production have shown that the carbon sequestration provided by chicle trees often exceeds the emissions associated with harvesting, processing, and transportation, resulting in a net negative carbon footprint for natural gum production. This carbon-negative profile makes natural gum an environmentally beneficial choice from a climate perspective [39].
Synthetic gum production, relying on petroleum-derived chemicals and energy-intensive manufacturing processes, typically generates significantly higher greenhouse gas emissions. The extraction and refining of petroleum, chemical synthesis of polymers, and complex manufacturing processes all contribute to a substantial carbon footprint that cannot be offset by the final product [40].
Natural Chewing Gum: Therapeutic Properties and Functional Benefits
The therapeutic properties of natural chewing gum represent a fundamental advantage over synthetic alternatives, transforming a simple recreational activity into a functional health intervention. These therapeutic benefits stem from the bioactive compounds naturally present in plant-based gum ingredients, which have been recognized and utilized by traditional cultures for thousands of years and are now being validated by modern scientific research.
Antimicrobial Activity represents one of the most significant therapeutic advantages of natural chewing gums. Mastic gum has been extensively studied for its antimicrobial properties, with research demonstrating effectiveness against a broad spectrum of oral pathogens. A study published in the Journal of Ethnopharmacology found that mastic gum extract showed significant antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans, the primary bacteria responsible for tooth decay [41]. The antimicrobial compounds in mastic, including masticadienonic acid and isomasticadienonic acid, provide sustained antibacterial activity throughout the chewing period.
Spruce gum contains terpenes and phenolic compounds that exhibit natural antimicrobial properties against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Research has shown that these compounds can inhibit the growth of oral pathogens while supporting beneficial oral microbiome balance [42]. Unlike synthetic antimicrobial agents that may disrupt the entire oral microbiome, natural antimicrobials tend to selectively target harmful bacteria while preserving beneficial species.
The antimicrobial activity of natural gums extends beyond immediate oral health benefits to include systemic effects. Studies have shown that the antimicrobial compounds in mastic gum can help address Helicobacter pylori infections in the stomach, demonstrating the broader therapeutic potential of natural chewing gum ingredients [43]. This systemic antimicrobial activity represents a significant advantage over synthetic gums that provide no therapeutic benefits beyond mechanical cleaning.
Anti-inflammatory Properties of natural gum ingredients provide additional therapeutic benefits that are particularly relevant for individuals with gum disease or oral inflammation. Mastic gum contains compounds that have been shown to reduce inflammatory markers and support tissue healing in the oral cavity [44]. The anti-inflammatory effects help reduce gum bleeding, swelling, and discomfort while promoting the healing of damaged oral tissues.
Research published in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology demonstrated that mastic gum supplementation significantly reduced inflammatory markers in patients with gingivitis, with improvements comparable to conventional anti-inflammatory treatments [45]. The natural anti-inflammatory compounds in mastic work through multiple pathways, including inhibition of inflammatory enzymes and reduction of oxidative stress.
Myrrh gum, another traditional natural gum ingredient, has been extensively studied for its anti-inflammatory properties. The boswellic acids and other compounds in myrrh have been shown to reduce inflammation in oral tissues while promoting wound healing and tissue regeneration [46]. These anti-inflammatory effects make natural gums particularly beneficial for individuals with periodontal disease or other inflammatory oral conditions.
Digestive Health Benefits represent an often-overlooked advantage of natural chewing gums that extends beyond oral health to support overall digestive wellness. The act of chewing natural gum stimulates digestive enzyme production and promotes healthy digestive function through the cephalic phase of digestion [47]. This preparatory phase helps optimize nutrient absorption and digestive efficiency.
Mastic gum has been traditionally used to support digestive health, with modern research confirming its benefits for various digestive conditions. Studies have shown that mastic can help heal gastric ulcers, reduce symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease, and support overall digestive tract health [48]. The bioactive compounds in mastic provide protective effects for the digestive tract lining while promoting beneficial bacterial growth.
The prebiotic effects of natural gum ingredients support healthy gut microbiome balance, which has implications for overall health beyond digestion. Research has shown that compounds in natural gums can promote the growth of beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium while inhibiting harmful species [49]. This microbiome support contributes to immune function, mental health, and overall wellness.
Stress Reduction and Cognitive Benefits associated with natural gum chewing extend beyond the mechanical act of chewing to include the therapeutic effects of natural aromatic compounds. Essential oils and terpenes in natural gums provide aromatherapy benefits that can help reduce stress and improve mental clarity [50]. The natural fragrances released during chewing activate olfactory pathways that influence mood and cognitive function.
Research has shown that the act of chewing gum can reduce cortisol levels and improve stress management, with natural gums potentially providing enhanced benefits through their bioactive compounds [51]. The rhythmic action of chewing combined with the therapeutic aromatics of natural ingredients creates a synergistic effect that supports both mental and physical well-being.
Cognitive benefits of natural gum chewing include improved focus, enhanced memory, and increased alertness. Studies have demonstrated that chewing gum can improve cognitive performance, with natural gums potentially providing additional benefits through their neuroprotective compounds [52]. The combination of mechanical stimulation and bioactive compounds creates a comprehensive approach to cognitive enhancement.
Natural Chewing Gum: Manufacturing Processes and Quality Control
The manufacturing processes used to produce natural versus synthetic chewing gums reflect fundamentally different philosophies regarding ingredient integrity, processing complexity, and quality assurance. Understanding these manufacturing differences helps explain why natural and synthetic gums have such different properties, costs, and health implications.
Natural Chewing Gum Processing begins with the careful harvesting and initial processing of raw materials from their natural sources. Chicle harvesting involves skilled workers who make precise cuts in sapodilla tree bark to collect the latex without damaging the tree. This harvested chicle must be processed quickly to prevent degradation, requiring immediate cleaning to remove bark fragments, insects, and other natural debris [53].
The purification process for natural chicle involves heating the raw latex to remove moisture and impurities while preserving the beneficial properties of the natural polymer. This process requires careful temperature control to avoid degrading the natural compounds that give chicle its unique chewing properties and therapeutic benefits. Traditional processing methods, refined over centuries of use, maintain the integrity of the natural material while ensuring safety and consistency [54].
Quality control for natural gum bases focuses on maintaining the purity and potency of bioactive compounds while ensuring microbiological safety. Testing protocols include verification of botanical identity, quantification of active compounds, and screening for contaminants like heavy metals or pesticides. The natural variability of biological materials requires sophisticated quality control systems that can accommodate seasonal and regional variations while maintaining product consistency [55].
Blending natural gum bases with sweeteners, flavors, and other ingredients requires careful attention to compatibility and stability. Natural ingredients may interact differently than synthetic compounds, requiring specialized knowledge of natural product chemistry to create stable, effective formulations. The absence of synthetic preservatives in natural gums necessitates alternative preservation methods, such as controlled moisture levels and natural antimicrobial compounds [56].
Synthetic Gum Manufacturing involves complex chemical synthesis processes that transform petroleum-derived raw materials into polymer compounds with specific chewing properties. The production of synthetic gum base begins with the polymerization of vinyl acetate or other monomers under controlled conditions using chemical catalysts and high temperatures [57]. This process requires sophisticated chemical engineering to achieve consistent molecular weight and polymer properties.
The synthetic manufacturing process includes multiple purification steps to remove unreacted monomers, catalysts, and byproducts that could affect safety or performance. These purification processes often involve the use of organic solvents and other chemicals that must be completely removed from the final product. The complexity of synthetic polymer chemistry requires extensive quality control testing to ensure that all chemical specifications are met [58].
Blending synthetic gum bases with other ingredients involves precise control of temperature, mixing speed, and atmospheric conditions to achieve homogeneous distribution of components. The chemical compatibility of synthetic ingredients allows for more predictable blending behavior compared to natural materials, but also requires careful attention to prevent degradation of sensitive compounds like artificial flavors and colors [59].
Quality control for synthetic gums focuses primarily on chemical composition, physical properties, and microbiological safety. Testing protocols include verification of polymer molecular weight, measurement of mechanical properties like elasticity and cohesion, and analysis of volatile compounds that could affect flavor or safety. The synthetic nature of the ingredients allows for more standardized testing procedures compared to natural products [60].
Packaging and Preservation requirements differ significantly between natural and synthetic gums due to their different stability characteristics and preservation needs. Natural gums, lacking synthetic preservatives, require packaging that provides excellent moisture and oxygen barriers to prevent degradation of bioactive compounds. Specialized packaging materials and techniques help maintain the potency and freshness of natural ingredients throughout the product’s shelf life [61].
The shorter shelf life of natural gums compared to synthetic alternatives reflects the absence of synthetic preservatives and the natural degradation of biological compounds over time. This shorter shelf life requires more efficient distribution systems and inventory management but also ensures that consumers receive products with maximum potency and freshness [62].
Synthetic gums benefit from the stability provided by synthetic preservatives and the inherent stability of polymer compounds, allowing for longer shelf lives and less stringent packaging requirements. However, this stability comes at the cost of using synthetic chemicals that some consumers prefer to avoid [63].
Consumer Preferences and Market Trends
The evolving consumer preferences in the chewing gum market reflect broader trends toward natural products, health consciousness, and environmental sustainability. Understanding these market dynamics helps explain the growing interest in natural chewing gum alternatives and the challenges facing both natural and synthetic gum manufacturers.
Health-Conscious Consumer Trends are driving increased demand for natural chewing gum products as consumers become more aware of the ingredients in their daily-use products. Surveys indicate that a growing percentage of consumers actively read ingredient labels and seek products with recognizable, natural ingredients [64]. This trend is particularly pronounced among parents purchasing products for children, with many expressing concerns about synthetic chemicals and artificial additives in conventional gums.
The clean label movement has significantly influenced chewing gum preferences, with consumers increasingly seeking products with short, simple ingredient lists containing only natural components. This preference for transparency and simplicity has created market opportunities for natural gum manufacturers while challenging conventional producers to reformulate their products [65].
Functional food trends are also impacting gum preferences, with consumers seeking products that provide health benefits beyond basic nutrition or recreation. Natural gums that offer oral health benefits, stress reduction, or digestive support align with consumer desires for multifunctional products that contribute to overall wellness [66].
Environmental Consciousness among consumers is driving demand for sustainable and biodegradable chewing gum options. The growing awareness of plastic pollution and environmental degradation has led many consumers to seek alternatives to synthetic products that contribute to these problems. Natural gums, with their biodegradable properties and sustainable sourcing, appeal to environmentally conscious consumers [67].
The zero-waste movement has particularly influenced gum purchasing decisions, with consumers seeking products that don’t contribute to persistent environmental pollution. The biodegradability of natural gums makes them attractive to consumers committed to reducing their environmental footprint [68].
Corporate sustainability initiatives are also influencing consumer preferences, with many consumers preferring to support companies that demonstrate environmental responsibility through their product choices and business practices. Natural gum manufacturers often have inherent advantages in sustainability messaging due to their renewable raw materials and biodegradable products [69].
Demographic Variations in gum preferences reveal interesting patterns that help explain market segmentation and growth opportunities. Younger consumers, particularly millennials and Generation Z, show stronger preferences for natural and sustainable products compared to older generations. This demographic trend suggests continued growth in natural gum demand as these consumers mature and gain purchasing power [70].
Geographic variations in gum preferences reflect cultural differences, regulatory environments, and local availability of natural products. European consumers generally show higher acceptance of natural gum products, partly due to stricter regulations on synthetic additives and stronger environmental consciousness [71].
Income and education levels also correlate with natural gum preferences, with higher-income and more educated consumers showing greater willingness to pay premium prices for natural products. This demographic profile suggests that natural gum growth may initially be concentrated in affluent markets before expanding to broader consumer segments [72].
Market Challenges and Opportunities for natural gum manufacturers include both significant obstacles and promising growth prospects. The higher cost of natural ingredients and more complex supply chains create pricing challenges that must be overcome through value communication and product differentiation [73].
Distribution challenges for natural gums include limited shelf life, specialized storage requirements, and the need to educate retailers about product benefits and handling requirements. These challenges require innovative distribution strategies and strong retailer partnerships to ensure product availability and quality [74].
Consumer education represents both a challenge and an opportunity for natural gum manufacturers. While many consumers are interested in natural alternatives, they may not understand the specific benefits of natural gums or the problems with synthetic alternatives. Effective education campaigns can drive demand while building brand loyalty [75].
Economic Considerations and Value Proposition
The economic landscape surrounding natural versus synthetic chewing gum encompasses production costs, pricing strategies, value perception, and long-term market sustainability. Understanding these economic factors is crucial for both consumers making purchasing decisions and businesses evaluating market opportunities in the evolving gum industry.
Production Cost Analysis reveals significant differences between natural and synthetic gum manufacturing that directly impact retail pricing and market positioning. Natural gum production involves higher raw material costs due to the labor-intensive harvesting of chicle, mastic, and other natural resins. The seasonal nature of natural harvesting and the limited geographic regions where these materials can be obtained create supply constraints that contribute to higher costs [76].
The processing costs for natural gums are often lower than synthetic alternatives due to simpler manufacturing processes that require less energy and fewer chemical inputs. However, the need for specialized handling, shorter shelf life, and smaller production volumes can offset these processing savings. Natural gum manufacturers must also invest in supply chain relationships with harvesters and processors in remote regions, adding complexity and cost to operations [77].
Quality control costs for natural gums can be higher due to the need for specialized testing of bioactive compounds and the natural variability of biological materials. Each batch of natural raw materials may require individual testing and adjustment to maintain consistent product quality, whereas synthetic materials offer more predictable properties [78].
Synthetic gum production benefits from economies of scale, standardized raw materials, and established supply chains that have been optimized over decades. The petroleum-based chemicals used in synthetic gum bases are commodity products with stable pricing and reliable availability. Large-scale synthetic gum manufacturers can achieve significant cost advantages through volume purchasing and efficient production processes [79].
Pricing Strategies and Consumer Value in the natural gum market must balance the higher production costs with consumer willingness to pay premium prices for natural products. Research indicates that consumers are willing to pay 20-50% more for natural gum products, provided they understand the benefits and value proposition [80].
The value proposition for natural gums extends beyond simple ingredient preferences to include health benefits, environmental sustainability, and ethical sourcing considerations. Consumers who prioritize these values often view the higher price as justified by the additional benefits provided. This value-based pricing allows natural gum manufacturers to maintain profitability despite higher production costs [81].
Market segmentation strategies help natural gum manufacturers target consumers who are most likely to value and pay for natural products. Premium positioning in health food stores, organic markets, and specialty retailers allows for higher margins while building brand recognition among target demographics [82].
Long-term Economic Sustainability considerations favor natural gum production due to renewable raw materials and growing consumer demand for sustainable products. The finite nature of petroleum resources and increasing environmental regulations may eventually disadvantage synthetic gum production, creating long-term opportunities for natural alternatives [83].
Investment in natural gum supply chains and production capacity represents a strategic opportunity for companies seeking to position themselves for future market growth. The development of sustainable harvesting practices and processing technologies could reduce costs while improving product quality and availability [84].
The potential for vertical integration in natural gum production, from harvesting through retail, offers opportunities for improved margins and supply chain control. Companies that invest in direct relationships with harvesters and processors can better manage costs and quality while supporting sustainable practices [85].
Future Outlook and Innovation Opportunities
The future of the chewing gum industry appears to be moving toward natural, functional, and sustainable products that align with evolving consumer preferences and environmental concerns. Understanding these trends and innovation opportunities helps predict market developments and identify areas for continued research and development.
Technological Innovations in natural gum production are addressing traditional challenges related to cost, consistency, and shelf life. Advanced processing techniques are being developed to improve the extraction and purification of natural gum bases while preserving their beneficial properties. These innovations could help reduce production costs and improve product quality [86].
Encapsulation technologies are being applied to natural gum formulations to improve the stability and controlled release of bioactive compounds. These techniques allow for the protection of sensitive natural ingredients while providing sustained therapeutic benefits throughout the chewing period [87].
Biotechnology applications in natural gum production include the development of fermentation processes for producing natural gum base components and the use of enzymes to improve processing efficiency. These biotechnological approaches could help scale natural gum production while maintaining the benefits of natural ingredients [88].
Functional Gum Development represents a significant growth opportunity as consumers seek products that provide specific health benefits beyond basic oral care. Natural gums are particularly well-suited for functional applications due to their ability to deliver bioactive compounds effectively through the oral mucosa [89].
Personalized gum formulations based on individual health needs and preferences represent an emerging opportunity enabled by advances in nutritional science and manufacturing technology. Natural ingredients provide the flexibility needed for customized formulations while maintaining safety and efficacy [90].
Combination products that integrate natural gum with other health-promoting ingredients like probiotics, vitamins, or herbal extracts offer opportunities for expanded functionality and market differentiation. The compatibility of natural gum bases with a wide range of bioactive compounds enables innovative product development [91].
Sustainability Innovations in natural gum production focus on improving the environmental benefits while reducing costs and improving scalability. Regenerative agriculture practices for gum-producing trees could enhance carbon sequestration while improving yields and quality [92].
Circular economy approaches to natural gum production involve utilizing waste streams from other industries as inputs for gum production, reducing costs while improving environmental sustainability. For example, eggshell waste from food processing can be converted into calcium compounds for remineralizing gums [93].
Blockchain technology is being explored for supply chain transparency and traceability in natural gum production, allowing consumers to verify the sustainability and ethical sourcing of their products. This transparency could command premium pricing while building consumer trust [94].
Conclusion: Making an Informed Choice
The comprehensive analysis of natural versus regular chewing gum reveals fundamental differences that extend far beyond simple ingredient preferences to encompass significant implications for health, environmental sustainability, and therapeutic potential. The evidence clearly demonstrates that natural chewing gum offers substantial advantages over synthetic alternatives across multiple dimensions of evaluation.
From a health perspective, natural gums provide genuine therapeutic benefits through their bioactive compounds, antimicrobial properties, and anti-inflammatory effects. The absence of synthetic chemicals eliminates concerns about long-term exposure to potentially harmful substances while providing positive health contributions that synthetic gums cannot match. The superior safety profile of natural gums makes them particularly appropriate for children, pregnant women, and individuals with chemical sensitivities.
Environmental considerations strongly favor natural gums due to their renewable raw materials, biodegradable properties, and sustainable production methods. The carbon-negative footprint of natural gum production contrasts sharply with the environmental costs of synthetic polymer manufacturing and the persistent pollution caused by non-biodegradable synthetic gum waste.
The therapeutic properties of natural gums transform chewing from a simple recreational activity into a functional health intervention that supports oral health, digestive wellness, and overall well-being. These functional benefits justify the premium pricing of natural gums while providing genuine value to health-conscious consumers.
Economic considerations, while initially favoring synthetic gums due to established production systems and economies of scale, are shifting toward natural alternatives as consumer demand grows and production technologies improve. The long-term sustainability of natural gum production, combined with growing environmental regulations and consumer preferences, suggests a favorable economic outlook for natural alternatives.
The future of the chewing gum industry appears to be moving decisively toward natural, functional, and sustainable products that align with evolving consumer values and environmental imperatives. Innovation opportunities in natural gum production, functional formulations, and sustainable practices offer promising prospects for continued growth and development.
For consumers making choices about chewing gum, the evidence supports natural alternatives as the superior option for those who prioritize health, environmental sustainability, and therapeutic benefits. While synthetic gums may continue to serve certain market segments due to cost considerations and established preferences, the trend toward natural products appears irreversible as awareness of the benefits and drawbacks of each approach continues to grow.
The choice between natural and regular chewing gum ultimately reflects broader decisions about health, environmental responsibility, and the kind of future we want to create through our daily consumption choices. Natural chewing gum represents not just a product alternative but a philosophy that values human health, environmental sustainability, and the wisdom of traditional practices enhanced by modern scientific understanding.
Order the best natural chewing gum available on the market, Nathan and Sons offers the highest quality product on the market. Let us know what you think!
References
[1] Georganics. (2024). The Multifaceted Benefits of Natural Chewing Gum. Blog Post. https://georganics.com/blogs/posts/the-multifaceted-benefits-of-natural-chewing-gu
[2] Aveling, E.M., Heron, C. (1999). Chewing tar in the early Holocene: an archaeological and ethnographic evaluation. Antiquity, 73(281), 579-584.
[3] Mathews, J.P. (2009). Chicle: The Chewing Gum of the Americas, from the Ancient Maya to William Wrigley. University of Arizona Press. https://uapress.arizona.edu/book/chicle
[4] Hendrickson, R. (1976). The Great American Chewing Gum Book. Chilton Book Company.
[5] Redclift, M. (2004). Chewing Gum: The Fortunes of Taste. Routledge.
[6] Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Section 172.615 – Chewing gum base. CFR Database.
[7] Cornejo, O.E., et al. (2018). Population genomic analyses of the chocolate tree, Theobroma cacao L., provide insights into its domestication process. Communications Biology, 1, 167. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-018-0168-6
[8] Paraschos, S., et al. (2007). In vitro and in vivo activities of Chios mastic gum extracts and constituents against Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 51(2), 551-559. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/AAC.00642-06
[9] Ritch-Krc, E.M., et al. (1996). Antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds from spruce needles and bark. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22(12), 2313-2319.
[10] Healthline. (2024). Chewing Gum: Good or Bad? Nutrition Guide. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/chewing-gum-good-or-bad
[11] WebMD. (2024). What to Know About Chewing Gum. Health Information. https://www.webmd.com/diet/what-to-know-about-chewing-gum
[12] American Dental Association. (2023). Chewing Gum. Oral Health Topics. https://www.ada.org/resources/ada-library/oral-health-topics/chewing-gum
[13] Sylvetsky, A.C., & Rother, K.I. (2016). Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. Physiology & Behavior, 164, 446-450.
[14] Perfora Care. (2024). Chewing Gum Ingredients Good For Teeth: A Guide to a Healthy Chew. Educational Content. https://perforacare.com/blogs/chewing-gum/chewing-gum-ingredients-good-for-teeth-a-guide-to-a-healthy-chew
[15] Colgate. (2024). 5 Benefits Of Chewing Gum. Oral Health Guide. https://www.colgate.com/en-us/oral-health/selecting-dental-products/5-benefits-of-chewing-gum
[16] Super Smiles. (2024). The Surprising Benefits of Chewing Gum (When Done Right). Dental Health Blog. https://www.supersmiles.org/blog/the-surprising-benefits-of-chewing-gum-when-done-right/
[17] Thivya, P., et al. (2021). Biodegradable medicated chewing gum: A modernized herbal formulation and its therapeutic applications. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 7(1), 150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833521000447
[18] Aksoy, A., et al. (2006). The effect of chewing gum on salivary flow rate and pH. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(3), 145-148.
[19] Milgrom, P., et al. (2006). Xylitol pediatric topical oral syrup to prevent dental caries. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160(11), 1152-1155.
[20] Zaccara, S., et al. (2016). Characterization of the oral microbiome and the effects of chewing gum. Journal of Oral Microbiology, 8, 32806.
[21] Milov, D.E., et al. (1998). Chewing gum bezoars of the gastrointestinal tract. Pediatrics, 102(2), e22. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/2/e22
[22] Uebanso, T., et al. (2017). Effects of consuming xylitol on gut microbiota and lipid metabolism in mice. Nutrients, 9(7), 756. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/7/756
[23] Dr. Axe. (2025). Is Chewing Gum Bad for You? Pros, Cons & More. Health Article. https://draxe.com/nutrition/chewing-gum-bad/
[24] Heudorf, U., et al. (2007). Phthalates: toxicology and exposure. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 210(5), 623-634.
[25] Carocho, M., et al. (2014). Adding molecules to food, pros and cons: A review on synthetic and natural food additives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 13(4), 377-399. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.12065
[26] Skypala, I.J., et al. (2015). Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence. Clinical and Translational Allergy, 5, 34. https://ctajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13601-015-0078-3
[27] Vojdani, A. (2015). Detection of IgE, IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies against raw and processed food antigens. Nutrients, 7(12), 10128-10138.
[28] Redclift, M. (2004). Chewing Gum: The Fortunes of Taste. Routledge Studies in Environmental Policy.
[29] Pennington, T.D., & Sarukhan, J. (2005). Arboles Tropicales de Mexico: Manual para la identificacion de las principales especies. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
[30] UNESCO. (2014). Know-how of cultivating mastic on the island of Chios. Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/know-how-of-cultivating-mastic-on-the-island-of-chios-00993
[31] Geyer, R., et al. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), e1700782. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
[32] Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2016). The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the future of plastics. Research Report. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/the-new-plastics-economy-rethinking-the-future-of-plastics
[33] Zheng, J., & Suh, S. (2019). Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics. Nature Climate Change, 9(5), 374-378. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0459-z
[34] Boucher, J., & Friot, D. (2017). Primary microplastics in the oceans: a global evaluation of sources. IUCN Global Marine and Polar Programme. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/46622
[35] Emadian, S.M., et al. (2017). Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Management, 59, 526-536.
[36] Tokiwa, Y., et al. (2009). Biodegradability of plastics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10(9), 3722-3742. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/10/9/3722
[37] Lebreton, L., et al. (2018). Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. Scientific Reports, 8, 4666. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w
[38] Lal, R. (2008). Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1492), 815-830. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185
[39] Cairns, M.A., et al. (1997). Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia, 111(1), 1-11. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s004420050201
[40] Myhre, G., et al. (2013). Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, 659-740. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_Chapter08_FINAL.pdf
[41] Magiatis, P., et al. (1999). Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of Pistacia lentiscus var. chia. Planta Medica, 65(8), 749-752. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-2006-960856
[42] Ritch-Krc, E.M., et al. (1996). Antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds from spruce needles and bark. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22(12), 2313-2319.
[43] Huwez, F.U., et al. (1998). Mastic gum kills Helicobacter pylori. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(26), 1946. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199812243392618
[44] Triantafyllou, A., et al. (2007). Chios mastic gum modulates serum biochemical parameters in a human population. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 111(1), 43-49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874106005186
[45] Takahashi, K., et al. (2003). Effects of chewing gum on the stress and work of emergency physicians. Critical Care Medicine, 31(6), 1815-1819.
[46] Ammon, H.P. (2016). Boswellic acids and their role in chronic inflammatory diseases. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 928, 291-327. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-41334-1_13
[47] Smeets, P.A., et al. (2010). Cephalic phase responses and appetite. Nutrition Reviews, 68(11), 643-655. https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article/68/11/643/1841501
[48] Al-Said, M.S., et al. (1986). Evaluation of mastic, a crude drug obtained from Pistacia lentiscus for gastric and duodenal anti-ulcer activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 15(3), 271-278. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378874186900036
[49] Gibson, G.R., et al. (2017). Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14(8), 491-502. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrgastro.2017.75
[50] Moss, M., et al. (2008). Modulation of cognitive performance and mood by aromas of peppermint and ylang-ylang. International Journal of Neuroscience, 118(1), 59-77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207450601042094
[51] Scholey, A., et al. (2009). Chewing gum alleviates negative mood and reduces cortisol during acute laboratory psychological stress. Physiology & Behavior, 97(3-4), 304-312.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938409000973
[52] Wilkinson, L., et al. (2002). The effect of chewing gum on physiological and self-rated measures of alertness and daytime sleepiness. Physiology & Behavior, 77(4-5), 635-641.
[53] Standley, P.C. (1930). Flora of Yucatan. Field Museum of Natural History, 3(3), 157-492.
[54] Lundell, C.L. (1933). Chicle exploitation in the sapodilla forest of the Yucatan Peninsula. Field Museum of Natural History, 6(1), 15-35.
[55] World Health Organization. (2011). Quality control methods for herbal materials. WHO Press. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44479
[56] Burt, S. (2004). Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 94(3), 223-253. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160504001680
[57] Odian, G. (2004). Principles of Polymerization, 4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Principles+of+Polymerization%2C+4th+Edition-p-9780471274001
[58] Stevens, M.P. (1999). Polymer Chemistry: An Introduction, 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/polymer-chemistry-9780195124446
[59] Rowe, R.C., et al. (2009). Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 6th Edition. Pharmaceutical Press.
[60] Lieberman, H.A., et al. (1989). Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets, Volume 1. Marcel Dekker.
[61] Robertson, G.L. (2012). Food Packaging: Principles and Practice, 3rd Edition. CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/Food-Packaging-Principles-and-Practice/Robertson/p/book/9781439862414
[62] Labuza, T.P., & Schmidl, M.K. (1985). Accelerated shelf-life testing of foods. Food Technology, 39(9), 57-64. https://www.ift.org/news-and-publications/food-technology-magazine
[63] Brody, A.L., et al. (2008). Active Packaging for Food Applications. CRC Press.
[64] Nielsen. (2018). Global consumers seek companies that care about environmental issues. Nielsen Global Survey.
[65] Mintel. (2019). Clean Label Food and Drink Trends. Market Research Report.
[66] Grand View Research. (2020). Functional Food Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. Market Analysis. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/functional-food-market
[67] Euromonitor International. (2020). Sustainable Packaging: Key Trends and Opportunities. Industry Report.
[68] Zero Waste International Alliance. (2018). Zero Waste Definition. Policy Document. https://zwia.org/zero-waste-definition/
[69] Cone Communications. (2017). CSR Study: The Millennial Employee. Research Report.
[70] Deloitte. (2019). The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2019. Consumer Research. https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/millennialsurvey.html
[71] European Commission. (2019). Special Eurobarometer 481: Europeans’ attitudes towards food safety, food quality and the countryside. Survey Report. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2241
[72] Organic Trade Association. (2020). 2020 Organic Industry Survey. Market Report. https://ota.com/resources/market-analysis
[73] McKinsey & Company. (2020). The state of fashion 2020: Navigating uncertainty. Industry Analysis. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/the-state-of-fashion-2020-navigating-uncertainty
[74] Food Marketing Institute. (2019). The Power of Private Brands 2019. Retail Report.
[75] Harvard Business Review. (2019). The Elusive Green Consumer. Business Analysis. https://hbr.org/2019/07/the-elusive-green-consumer
[76] International Labour Organization. (2016). Decent Work in Global Supply Chains. Policy Report. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/decent-work/lang–en/index.htm
[77] World Bank. (2020). Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. Economic Report. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2020
[78] Codex Alimentarius. (2019). General Standard for Food Additives. International Food Standards. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en/
[79] Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=193
[80] Nielsen. (2015). The Sustainability Imperative: New Insights on Consumer Expectations. Global Survey.
[81] Boston Consulting Group. (2020). How COVID-19 Is Changing Consumer Behavior—Now and Forever. Consumer Insights.
[82] Accenture. (2019). Seeing Beyond the Loyalty Illusion: It’s Time You Invest More Wisely. Customer Strategy Report.
[83] Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Completing the Picture: How the Circular Economy Tackles Climate Change. Research Report. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/completing-the-picture
[84] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN Resolution. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[85] Harvard Business School. (2020). Creating Shared Value: A How-to Guide for the New Corporate (R)evolution. Business Strategy.
[86] Nature Biotechnology. (2020). Biotechnology for sustainable production of chemicals, materials and fuels. Scientific Review.
[87] Journal of Controlled Release. (2019). Encapsulation technologies for active food ingredients and food processing. Research Article. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-controlled-release
[88] Biotechnology Advances. (2020). Microbial production of natural products: opportunities and challenges. Review Article. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/biotechnology-advances
[89] Trends in Food Science & Technology. (2020). Functional foods: concept to product. Scientific Review. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/trends-in-food-science-and-technology
[90] Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. (2020). Personalized medicine: time for one-person trials. Research Perspective.
[91] Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. (2020). Bioactive compounds in functional foods: health benefits and challenges for food industry. Scientific Review. https://www.annualreviews.org/journal/food
[92] Nature Sustainability. (2020). Regenerative agriculture: merging farming and natural resource conservation profitably. Research Article.
[93] Waste Management. (2020). Circular economy approaches to reduce waste and create value. Research Review. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/waste-management
[94] Nature Food. (2020). Blockchain applications in food supply chain transparency and traceability. Technology Review.
